Checked against the current site data and kept only when the claim is stable enough to use in tools.
Use for code rewards, calculator thresholds, or page claims that should be safe for a player decision.
Track how this site handles Wizard Alchemy data before it becomes a guide recommendation, calculator assumption, or long-tail page.
Codes, race passives, potion thresholds, material drops, and boss routes can change or conflict across public guides. This log keeps uncertainty visible so new pages do not publish unverified values as final facts.
These labels are not decoration. They decide whether a claim can be used in a calculator, written as a guide rule, or kept only as a watchlist note.
Use for code rewards, calculator thresholds, or page claims that should be safe for a player decision.
Use for race odds, potion thresholds, material roles, and farming route advice.
Use for new codes, newly reported drops, new bosses, or update rumors.
Use when a reward, drop chance, passive value, or unlock path needs a visible warning.
This log explains the current site assumptions and what needs to be rechecked before new claims are promoted.
The new material pages answer high-intent search questions with conservative route, use, and save advice instead of unverified drop rates.
Recheck exact drop sources and rates before adding database-style enemy tables.The site now explains how verified, tracked, watchlist, and conflict claims should be handled before they appear in player-facing guides.
Apply the same labels to future code, material, spell, and route updates.The spells page keeps Magic requirements and race-fit language as planning guidance instead of exact passive-stat claims.
Recheck potion names, Magic gates, and race compatibility after each major update.Race odds and role notes are useful for reroll planning, but exact passive text can change after balance patches.
Confirm exact passive wording before adding stronger database-style claims.Furnace Core and Copper Earring have strong search intent, but exact drops and rates should not be expanded until checked.
Build individual material pages only with cautious source notes or verified in-game evidence.Some public guide pages can disagree on rewards or active status. Conflicting code data should stay labeled instead of being silently merged.
Add per-code confidence fields if new code conflicts appear.These topics have search value, but they should be handled with clear verification notes before becoming database-style pages.
The first conservative guide is live, but exact drop sources still need confirmation.
Recheck source wording and add enemy-specific data only after reliable verification.The first conservative guide is live for potion planning and farming route queries.
Confirm singular/plural naming, drop sources, and exact rates before expanding the page.Players benefit from next-target and short-by-Magic feedback.
Add material filtering and next threshold feedback to the calculator.Code pages can change quickly and copied lists often drift.
Store confidence status with each code when a conflict is found.New material drops, exact rates, and passive values stay conservative until checked.
A route can be useful even when exact drop rates are not ready for publication.
If sources disagree, the page should explain the conflict instead of hiding it.
Calculators should use the most stable values and point players to recheck notes.
Wizard Alchemy changes quickly, and copied guide data can drift. Source labels make it clear whether a claim is verified, tracked, on the watchlist, or conflicting.
No. Tracked means the data is useful enough for the current site, but it should be rechecked after major game updates or balance changes.
A conflict label is used when sources disagree about a code reward, drop value, passive effect, unlock path, or other player-facing detail.
The current watchlist prioritizes Furnace Core, Copper Earring, potion planner improvements, and code conflict labels.